Understanding South American politics. A superficial review

In order to better understand what goes on in the mentioned region we have to know some parts of the recent history.

I decided to go back to the sixties, because there is still a direct link between the events that happened at that time with the events that we witness nowadays. During the sixties, inspired by the Cuban revolution and by a good number of left wing thinkers, many movements that tried to solve “the problems of society” emerged. One of these unresolved issues was the property of the land.

Since the times of the Spanish Conquistadores, the land had been property of people of Spanish/European descent. This situation created a lot of stress between the Indian/Mestizo people and the ruling elites, specially in countries with large Indian populations like Peru, Bolivia and Ecuador. After witnessing the victory of Fidel Castro in New Year’s Eve of 1959, some of these movements opted for the violent revolution .

The Colombian FARC had its origin in the fight for land reform of those times. These movements failed to achieve their goals. Che Guevara was killed in Bolivia, the movements faded away in 1965 in Peru. The FARC continues until now, but I do not know if with its original goals.

After that, different countries had different evolutions. In Bolivia and Ecuador, land reform never happened. In Peru, the left wing military government of Velasco declared the land reform in 1969. In 1970 Salvador Allende was elected president in Chile. Socialist ideas were thriving. The USA thought that it would lose the region to the Soviet sphere of influence. In most countries, pressure from the US was felt.

In 1973, Allende’s government fell and Pinochet seized power. In 1975, Velasco’s government in Peru fell, leading to a pro US government by Morales-Bermudez, in 1976 Videla obtained power in Argentina, initiating a fierce hunt of socialist and communists, not only in Argentina, but in Brazil, Uruguay, Chile, Bolivia, Peru and Paraguay. The military governments of all those countries formed an association called AAA (Alianza Anticomunista Americana), with approval of the CIA. The executed a plan called “Condor” to wipe out the left wing ideology from South America.

At the same time, countries like Colombia (in spite of the FARC) and Venezuela remained more stable and were enjoying better economic times associated with the high oil prices in the international market. Human right concerns and the external debt crisis put pressure on the military governments and a democratic (and progressive) wave disseminated through the region. In 1982 Siles in the Bolivia, in 1983 Alfonsin in Argentina, in 1985 Garcia in Peru, in 1990 Aylwin in Chile obtained power by democratic means.

However, this wave of progressiveness did not last long since the economic models failed and led the countries into hyperinflation. A new wave of right wing governments, with more democratic manners emerged in Peru, Argentina, Bolivia, Ecuador, Uruguay, Paraguay. Chile followed a stable pathway, Venezuela experienced the economic crisis for the first time and led to Chavez attempted coup in 1992. In Peru, Fujimori instituted an autocratic regime in 1992.

With the new millennium, the pendulum started to swing to the left again. Venezuela elected Chavez in 1999, Argentina elected Kirchner in 2002, Chile elected Lagos also in 2002, Brazil elected Lula in 2003, Ecuador elected Gutierrez in 2003 and Uruguay elected Vasquez in 2005. They are all left wing politicians. The case of Peru and Colombia is interesting. The Shining Path and the FARC, respectively, have created certain fear in the population towards the left wing movements.

The relationships with Cuba have changed based on the left or right wing orientation of the governments.

The actions of the US in South America have been felt ever since the cold war. The US is obviously interested in having control of the whole continent and uses their influences in order to achieve that goal. For this topic, I recommend strongly a CNN special called “The Cold War” available in VHS. One of its chapters is called “Backyard” and it refers specifically about the actions of the US in Latin America.


Thank you so much, Marco for this much needed outline of the regions history. The media is not hot at the moment with the happenings between Latin America and Cuba but it will be in the future especially as the US will no doubt intervene. Of course, it will once again be for 'freedom and democracy' because Socialism is so evil and not for the OIL.  

Posted by Dianne
3/15/2005 08:47:00 am  
I often wondered why the US called themselves indiscriminately "USA" or "America". I mean.... at school I was taught about the continents, like North America, Africa, etc. I also learned about countries, like Congo, Denmark, Mexico, etc.

But I now realize why the USA call themselves America. It's because they think they own the entire 2 American continents from Alaska down to the tip of Chile. 

Posted by WhyNot
3/15/2005 09:48:00 am  

An excellent article and a great overview of the hypocritical nature of the foreign policy of the United States over the past decades. Just another example of "what is" and "what should be" failing to mesh, I guess.

Oh, and when I use the term "American," I mean all of us, North and South. I was politely taken to task for that slip of the tongue in Brussels many years ago when I shared several drinks with a soft-spoken Colombian gentleman. He said, without rancor or bile, that it was indicative of the way people of the United States saw themselves (and the world) that they would actually call themselves "True Americans" or other statements of the like. I have avoided calling myself an "American" since that day.

Posted by eponymous
3/16/2005 05:42:00 am  
Also, considering the Bush Adminstration's reaction (and quick back-tracking) to their little coup to unseat Chavez, it appears that the cycle is beginning to repeat itself.
3/16/2005 05:43:00 am  
PS: I don't go for cult following in the least, but I must admit Che Guevara is one of those ppl I admire hugely, and is to me a human symbol of striving for justice on this planet.

Interestingly, Che Guevara's image in Europe is clearly that of a hero, even in our very capitalistic western Europe countries.  

Posted by WhyNot
3/16/2005 05:47:00 am  
"Also, considering the Bush Adminstration's reaction (and quick back-tracking) to their little coup to unseat Chavez, it appears that the cycle is beginning to repeat itself.  "

I would go so far to say that Chavez better watch himself closely and have someone supervise the handling of his food.

This past Friday Chavez hosted President Mohammad Khatami of Iran.

"Iran has every right..to develop atomic energy and to continue its research in that area," Chavez said at a joint appearance with Khatami.
"All over the world, there is a clamor for equality...and profound
rejection of the imperialist desires of the U.S. government. Faced with the threat of the U.S. government against our brother people in Iran, count on us for all our support."

In a recent interview on al-Jazeera, Chavez called for developing nations to unite against U.S. political and economic policies. "What can we do regarding the imperialist power of the United States? We have no choice but to unite," he said. Venezuela's energy alliances with nations such as Cuba, which receives cheap oil, are an example of how "we use oil in our war
against neoliberalism," he said.

Six Latin American nations, most recently Uruguay, now have presidents whose views clash, in varying degrees, with Washington's.

Posted by Dianne
3/16/2005 09:48:00 am  
"Six Latin American nations, most recently Uruguay, now have presidents whose views clash, in varying degrees, with Washington's "

All sounds very encouraging. Sound like Chavez may be the Che Guevara of the new millenium. Let's hope he makes it - the US have the boring habit of murdering anyone who dares disagreeing with them - must have something to do with "Democracy the American Way" . 

Posted by WhyNot
3/16/2005 12:58:00 pm  
So far, South American politics have moved like a pendulum. Although we are third world countries with milllions of poor people, we also have pretty well educated middle classes that have the potential of being ideologically independent from any imperialist proposal and can lead the way to an independent group of countries with common interests. 

Posted by Dr. Marco
3/18/2005 01:10:00 pm  



<< Home